So bad

The Aternos forums are now deprecated

Learn more about this change here.

For help regarding Aternos, we recommend you to visit our support center.

  • Shouldn't they take actions? 16

    1. Literally (12) 75%
    2. No (4) 25%

    well yes from the subject you can already to tell how bad this minecraft server host is, not by any means showing hatred towards aternos but indeed towards the service they give, I mean I've seen lots of other threads sharing the same concept of mine and what the staff' reply was just all about ignorance not even showing interest about it or thinking about it, at least if put a good fixed number of ram to everyone and have an auto server deletion for servers that havent gone online for like 6 months or so, to give opportunity or even a probability of being able to add ram, I mean yes 'you didn't like the service, leave it' I understand so, but so far this is the best host, while term best here is rated over the free hosts not the paid, so pretty much best worst one, if that makes sense.

    I mean I acknowledge how hard it is but like, have something that really motivates users to keep up with you, either it is ram increasement, hosting improved performance, or any other thing that actually motivates live users to keep up with you. It's open for every1 taht might be the reason it is bad? Okay feature an auto deletion like I said, would be the best to free up space and increasing ram for users.

    Staff are showing no interest in feedbacks, just replying with the same thing always, dwindling everything down wont be good for either us or aternos, so better to try and fix, I hope you take that into consideration and star showing actions cuz we really need a better performance for the only good free host out there, I hope I wont get an air -head reply of the same thing we see everytime.

  • well yes from the subject you can already to tell how bad this minecraft server host is, not by any means showing hatred towards aternos but indeed towards the service they give, I mean I've seen lots of other threads sharing the same concept of mine and what the staff' reply was just all about ignorance not even showing interest about it or thinking about it, at least if put a good fixed number of ram to everyone and have an auto server deletion for servers that havent gone online for like 6 months or so, to give opportunity or even a probability of being able to add ram, I mean yes 'you didn't like the service, leave it' I understand so, but so far this is the best host, while term best here is rated over the free hosts not the paid, so pretty much best worst one, if that makes sense.

    100% free server hosting has 15M users, no paid thing , adds new features (forge added and custom mods and the new upcoming aternos server list) and auto deletion? maybe because users increased, and if you know how to use the given amount of ram that would be good at first as i have 50+ plugins on an exact version i selected to make best performance and has 200MB ram usage and it goes to 500 with 10 players or more, aternos increased the ram than the past the problem is not in aternos if you asking for 1.13+ versions it's from mojang because performance issues started from there and if you asking for mods/modpacks mods is "mods" very unstabel and can crash even on big amount of ram server and to run modpacks well that means ram must be increased to 4GB, aternos gives newer version and mods/modpacks better ram than -1.12.2 versions

    I mean I acknowledge how hard it is but like, have something that really motivates users to keep up with you, either it is ram increasement, hosting improved performance, or any other thing that actually motivates live users to keep up with you. It's open for every1 taht might be the reason it is bad? Okay feature an auto deletion like I said, would be the best to free up space and increasing ram for users.

    for the auto deletion again i think it might be a good idea i think wait answer from team


    Staff are showing no interest in feedbacks, just replying with the same thing always, dwindling everything down wont be good for either us or aternos, so better to try and fix, I hope you take that into consideration and star showing actions cuz we really need a better performance for the only good free host out there, I hope I wont get an air -head reply of the same thing we see everytime.

    Helpers/Aternos team replying with the same thing because it's the true thing, replying with another answer means it's false

    and Aternos team shows alot of interest having forum/discord/twitter/reddit and discord has no official answer from team mostly, but in tickets/forum mostly one of the team replies (in tiickets it's certain and takes sometime for one of the team to answer)

    and take in mind not all thier life on pc, they have thier life too

  • Well maybe I havent made this clear, I havent mentioned anything about me not being dexterous of manipulating the ram I received in orded to get the best performance, rn you're stating that ram with 50+ plugins and 10 players would be enough and I know that. While what I really meant in my feedback, wasn't just for the ram, couple things.

    Well be honest, haven't you faced issues like not being able to turn on your server, or waiting 5 - 15 mins to just launch your server stuck with -Loading...- or -Starting...- dun tell me that it's my own issue, I customised my server very well.
    Haven't you at least once tried to launch your server and woah you did but luckily you cant join due to how laggy it was while no one is already on the server and you have a lot less plugins than 50?
    All plugins highly customised, perfectly matching with your version, forced to use paper on 1.13.2 and still getting bad host?
    Okay let me assume that you have faced none of those I mentioned, and as you mentioned aternos reply with the same thing over n over just cuz it's the true thing, alright mate, isn't it weird, like they all agree this is the best aternos yet the worst? They should take actions, either it's something they figured out or a new system or whatever, the only concept here wasnt for the ram as you might have thought, I'm just asking for a better host, and I already acknowledged up there that the host has too many users, ngl my friends have accounts they no longer use while it's being count as one of the proudly earned 11M users, that's why Iasked for an auto deletion, having a high number of users to show how good the aternos host is, isnt actually a good idea, but having a high number of users yet giving more space for new users and old active users to get better hosting performance, that's the wanted thing. I really appreciate the aternos hard working, but give it a time think about it in case it might cause any err, and come up with the best new update where it would be much more better than how it used to be, all the love for aternos and aternos staff team :aternos:

  • Well maybe I havent made this clear, I havent mentioned anything about me not being dexterous of manipulating the ram I received in orded to get the best performance, rn you're stating that ram with 50+ plugins and 10 players would be enough and I know that. While what I really meant in my feedback, wasn't just for the ram, couple things

    ok lets see


    Well be honest, haven't you faced issues like not being able to turn on your server, or waiting 5 - 15 mins to just launch your server stuck with -Loading...- or -Starting...- dun tell me that it's my own issue, I customised my server very well.
    Haven't you at least once tried to launch your server and woah you did but luckily you cant join due to how laggy it was while no one is already on the server and you have a lot less plugins than 50?
    All plugins highly customised, perfectly matching with your version, forced to use paper on 1.13.2 and still getting bad host?

    im able to turn me server if im not my friend did //replacenear 20000 air tnt :/

    waiting 5-15 mins is queue (if you mean that not starting) Loading to load binaries and starting while your server start after loading the binaries, it's take so long because 1.13+ tbh is the worst versions in performance i have ever seen (even on a paid host i tried)

    50 plugins on 1.13+ servers is pretty much even normal 1.13+ crash alot (not from ram) but new vanilla versions unplayable without PaperMC

    and i always can join my server is lag free and can't get to 40% usage with the 10 players as i mentioned and it can goes to 15 players (the lag is from the version) just try vanilla 1.8.8 and then try vanilla 1.13 tell me the difference

    even if you use 1.13+ on any host you will get at least a problem or you need x4 amount of ram of what aternos give (probably makes aternos spend than the income)

    Okay let me assume that you have faced none of those I mentioned, and as you mentioned aternos reply with the same thing over n over just cuz it's the true thing, alright mate, isn't it weird, like they all agree this is the best aternos yet the worst? They should take actions, either it's something they figured out or a new system or whatever, the only concept here wasnt for the ram as you might have thought, I'm just asking for a better host, and I already acknowledged up there that the host has too many users, ngl my friends have accounts they no longer use while it's being count as one of the proudly earned 11M users, that's why Iasked for an auto deletion, having a high number of users to show how good the aternos host is, isnt actually a good idea, but having a high number of users yet giving more space for new users and old active users to get better hosting performance, that's the wanted thing. I really appreciate the aternos hard working, but give it a time think about it in case it might cause any err, and come up with the best new update where it would be much more better than how it used to be, all the love for aternos and aternos staff team :aternos:

    ok, aternos is the best host out and the actions should be took from mojang not the host and aternos gives most amount of ram and as i mentioned it increased ram than before and improved the hosting and upcoming updates will occur, and for better host i think that will cost aternos alot of $$$$, old inactive users doesn't affect your performance at all as they just take a little amount of space due to the old versions was lite and all users are limited to 4GB of ram space amount

    and for new updates let's see from aternos team :aternos:

    • Official Post

    I mean I acknowledge how hard it is but like, have something that really motivates users to keep up with you, either it is ram increasement, hosting improved performance, or any other thing that actually motivates live users to keep up with you. It's open for every1 taht might be the reason it is bad? Okay feature an auto deletion like I said, would be the best to free up space and increasing ram for users.

    You're messing up two different things here.

    Ram is only used by servers which are currently online. Servers stop when no one plays on them to free up RAM for different users.

    Deleting old servers wouldn't increase performance, it would only free up storage capacity on our storage system where offline servers are stored. Also we already do that: https://support.aternos.org/hc…retention-of-server-data-


    Staff are showing no interest in feedbacks, just replying with the same thing always, dwindling everything down wont be good for either us or aternos, so better to try and fix, I hope you take that into consideration and star showing actions cuz we really need a better performance for the only good free host out there, I hope I wont get an air -head reply of the same thing we see everytime.

    That's not true.


    rn you're stating that ram with 50+ plugins and 10 players would be enough and I know that. .

    Where do we say that?



    We monitor Aternos, its servers, systems and components very closely and with great detail.

    We know what the general performance is and where the fire is.

    It's simply a fact that most of the lag is caused by plugins or mods, or as now, by the massively worse performance of the minecraft server software (1.13 and up)

    Every day over 150k different servers get started on Aternos, we can not assist everyone in troubleshooting their plugins and mods. This is just not doable, even if we are 30 times more people than rn.

    You're also talking about a server with about 50 plugins. That you can join your server at all is actually a miracle. More RAM doesn't help.

    Minecraft is the most modular game there is.

    The amount of possibilities in terms of expansion, modification and customization are limitless.

    But it is also, in terms of performance, the biggest problem.

  • Well maybe I havent made this clear, I havent mentioned anything about me not being dexterous of manipulating the ram I received in orded to get the best performance, rn you're stating that ram with 50+ plugins and 10 players would be enough and I know that. While what I really meant in my feedback, wasn't just for the ram, couple things.

    Well be honest, haven't you faced issues like not being able to turn on your server, or waiting 5 - 15 mins to just launch your server stuck with -Loading...- or -Starting...- dun tell me that it's my own issue, I customised my server very well.
    Haven't you at least once tried to launch your server and woah you did but luckily you cant join due to how laggy it was while no one is already on the server and you have a lot less plugins than 50?
    All plugins highly customised, perfectly matching with your version, forced to use paper on 1.13.2 and still getting bad host?
    Okay let me assume that you have faced none of those I mentioned, and as you mentioned aternos reply with the same thing over n over just cuz it's the true thing, alright mate, isn't it weird, like they all agree this is the best aternos yet the worst? They should take actions, either it's something they figured out or a new system or whatever, the only concept here wasnt for the ram as you might have thought, I'm just asking for a better host, and I already acknowledged up there that the host has too many users, ngl my friends have accounts they no longer use while it's being count as one of the proudly earned 11M users, that's why Iasked for an auto deletion, having a high number of users to show how good the aternos host is, isnt actually a good idea, but having a high number of users yet giving more space for new users and old active users to get better hosting performance, that's the wanted thing. I really appreciate the aternos hard working, but give it a time think about it in case it might cause any err, and come up with the best new update where it would be much more better than how it used to be, all the love for aternos and aternos staff team :aternos:

    your right the staff shows 0 intrest on our feedbacks and requests

    • Official Post

    your right the staff shows 0 intrest on our feedbacks and requests

    Just use the search function to find out why we do not add this or that plugin/software.

    Everything you have asked for so far has already been discussed thousands of times in detail here in the forum.

  • Just use the search function to find out why we do not add this or that plugin/software.

    Everything you have asked for so far has already been discussed thousands of times in detail here in the forum.

    are u litteraly the only one working in aternos. Why do only you reply out of everyone.

    • Official Post

    are u litteraly the only one working in aternos.

    You can see the team here: https://aternos.org/:en/#team (Just noticed that Julian is missing there O.o)

    Why do only you reply out of everyone.

    The others are more active on other platforms. Additionally our work is more than interacting with users. (Development, keeping everything up-and-running etc.)

  • Roman

    Closed the thread.