
Bukkit Again
-
- English
- Java Edition
- NatickYT
- Closed
The Aternos forums are now deprecated
Learn more about this change here.
For help regarding Aternos, we recommend you to visit our support center.
-
-
And The Other One Is Too Big
-
I'm not sure what you're trying to tell us here?
-
I'm not sure what you're trying to tell us here?
can u help me with my thread plz
-
I'm not sure what you're trying to tell us here?
It Says “Minecraft 1.17 has been released and we will begin working on the update as soon as possible (i.e. when Spigot releases). See the issue linked above for more information on our update process. Have fun testing out new features in singleplayer!“ On The Official Discord Of PaperMC And “Spigot hasn’t even released 1.17 yet, and Paper is a fork of Spigot”
-
Still don't get it.
We can't update until papermc updated, which can only update when spigot updated.
-
No They Can’t
-
I don't think he has any question from the beginning.
-
No They Can’t
That's what i said. If you had properly read.
Did this thread have any purpose whatsoever besides proving something that no one ever said otherwise of?
-
That's what i said. If you had properly read.
Did this thread have any purpose whatsoever besides proving something that no one ever said otherwise of?
An Old Post I Guess RE: Minecraft Bukkit But I’m Proofing That Paper Is A Fork Of Spigot So It Should Be Paper/Spigot Not Paper/Bukkit
-
Spigot is a fork of bukkit.
That's why paper/bukkit.
-
Spigot is a fork of bukkit.
That's why paper/bukkit.
It Could Be Paper/Spigot/Bukkit
-
The reason why we added "/bukkit" to Paper and Spigot is just to make clear that it's somehow related to Bukkit. Many people don't understand that Spigot and Paper share the same Plugin-System.
We don't try to tell our users the whole Software History with that naming.
-
The reason why we added "/bukkit" to Paper and Spigot is just to make clear that it's somehow related to Bukkit. Many people don't understand that Spigot and Paper share the same Plugin-System.
We don't try to tell our users the whole Software History with that naming.
Ok But Maybe An “Info” Section Saying It?
-
That's rather unnecessary and the name suggests enough.
-
MiataBoy
Closed the thread.